call_end

    • Fo chevron_right

      Off-Topic • [Discussion] What do you do with 10+ years old laptops that still work fine?

      news.woodpeckersnest.space / forums-debian-net:0 • 6 April • 3 minutes

    I am working for a non profit and I am responsible for our computer hardware. We use almost exclusively free software. At least since Corona with the need to work from home offices we have had exclusively laptops. And nobody seems to want to return to desktop systems. I usually buy used high-end business laptops for about 300 to 500 Euros from Dell, Lenovo or sometimes HP.

    We mostly have intel systems with 8th to 10th generation CPUs and only a few more modern and powerful systems for those of us who edit high-res videos.

    Usually, I check devices I do get back from my colleagues and if they are still in working condition after I have cleaned them up I install a fresh system and prepare them as drop-in replacement devices colleagues can instantly use if they encounter issues that can't be fixed within a few minutes. Therefore, I have established that I try to get very similar devices for all colleagues so that it is easy to just swap out the M.2 SSD in order to allow them to carry on with their work while I try to find and solve the issue they had with their previous device. (It seems crazy to me that most of the business world uses Windows which doesn't allow the very handy practice of just putting the SSD into an other device.) Only rarely the hardware is broken and most of the time I can just prepare the old device for later use.

    There are more and more older devices that never get used again, because my colleagues seem to work in a much different way than I am. I still use a device with a 2nd gen Intel CPU for arguably more demanding (graphic design) tasks than they need to do. They do have considerably more powerful hardware than me and still often complain that their devices are insufferably slow. I wonder if this is their experience because they surf on anti-social media platform pages the whole day which do senseless massive Javascript processing in the browser, have loads of tabs open and every installed application running at the same time.

    I can't do everything at once and therefore, I don't need to have everything opened at once. Am I old school that I only open what I can work on at every given time and that I am not interested in those annoying platforms? (The other day we got such a huge Excel sheet that some people couldn't even open it. I don't see that as a limitation of our hardware but as a rather stupid way to share a too large amount of data.)

    But I am digressing: I am troubled by the fact that we do have already about 20 laptops that are over 10 years old and which will probably never be used again despite me knowing that I could do every task I need to do on them perfectly fine without wasting my time by waiting for them to respond. I checked out local social projects that collect hardware to hand them out to poor people but they are only accepting hardware that isn't older than 10 years.

    I get that older hardware is less efficient but the usual office tasks are not demanding enough to actually need such new hardware. The only Issue I encountered on 20+ years old laptops is that most "modern" web pages are to heavy to be displayed on those devices. This also confirms my annoyance with present day web developers and designers: Most content could easily be served much more efficiently. We don't need to limit ourselves to Gopher to only use technologies that make sense in any given context. Only very few people seem to care about efficiency (and about avoiding unwanted data collection in the background).

    I am fine with using older hardware, but I can't use several computers at once. Are you happy with throwing away older still working hardware? Or do you have a better solution?

    Statistics: Posted by Onsemeliot — 2025-04-06 17:45


    • Fo chevron_right

      Docs, HowTos, Tips & Tricks • 2025-04-06

      news.woodpeckersnest.space / forums-debian-net:0 • 6 April

    [SOLVED] kvm module is loaded by default now in Sid? It conflicts with Virtualbox... :linked:
    "Just search for that command that prevents the kvm module from loading at boot"

    [Solved] Debian 12 freeze/crash, unknown cause :linked:
    "I guess the lesson is remove all your peripherals before investigating an issue."

    [Solved] And yet again, Xfce black screen after suspend.... :linked:
    "I had a very similar problem. Apparently it's related to XFCE resume/wake up process after suspend or hibernate. In my case only occurred under certain conditions"

    Statistics: Posted by Best_Threads — 2025-04-06 17:43


    • Fo chevron_right

      Installation • Re: dpkg --get/--set -selections for new install

      news.woodpeckersnest.space / forums-debian-net:0 • 6 April • 1 minute

    Hello,

    According to dpkg manual [1]:
    [..]
    --set-selections

    Set package selections using file read from stdin. This file should be in the format “package state”, where state is one of install, hold, deinstall or purge. Blank lines and comment lines beginning with ‘#’ are also permitted.

    The available file needs to be up-to-date for this command to be useful, otherwise unknown packages will be ignored with a warning. See the --update-avail and --merge-avail commands for more information.
    and:
    --merge-avail [Packages-file]

    Update dpkg's and dselect's idea of which packages are available. With action --merge-avail, old information is combined with information from Packages-file. With action --update-avail, old information is replaced with the information in the Packages-file. The Packages-file distributed with Debian is simply named «Packages». If the Packages-file argument is missing or named «-» then it will be read from standard input (since dpkg 1.17.7). dpkg keeps its record of available packages in /var/lib/dpkg/available.
    Always from the dpkg manual (--merge-avail option):
    A simpler one-shot command to retrieve and update the available file is #c9d2d8;padding:0 3px;">dselect update. Note that this file is mostly useless if you don't use dselect but an APT-based frontend: APT has its own system to keep track of available packages.
    So, the commands should be (examples in [1], FAQ in [2]):

    Code:

    sudo apt install dselectsudo dselect updatesudo dpkg --set-selections < InstalledPkgs.txt
    or:

    Code:

    sudo apt-cache dumpavail | dpkg --merge-availsudo dpkg --set-selections < InstalledPkgs.txt
    Hope this helps
    --
    [1] https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/dpkg
    [2] Q: Why does ''dpkg --set-selections'' not record selections for unknown packages?

    Statistics: Posted by Aki — 2025-04-06 17:43


    • Fo chevron_right

      Testing And Unstable • Re: [Testing - Trixie] preseed issues with crypto

      news.woodpeckersnest.space / forums-debian-net:0 • 6 April

    Shouldn't this better be reported in the bug tracker?

    Statistics: Posted by ilu — 2025-04-06 17:25


    • Fo chevron_right

      Installation • Re: dpkg --get/--set -selections for new install

      news.woodpeckersnest.space / forums-debian-net:0 • 6 April

    Thanks for responding.

    One of the first commands I ran after the installation was
    sudo -s apt-get update,
    so no issue there.

    And in answering your question:

    Code:

     $ apt-cache policy adbadb:  Installed: (none)  Candidate: 1:29.0.6-28  Version table:     1:29.0.6-28 500        500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64 Packages
    And for any package I've tried, if I use a single package name (for example use adb) I can install it with apt-get install.

    Statistics: Posted by ramack — 2025-04-06 17:03


    • Fo chevron_right

      Installation • Re: Install with two encrypted disks

      news.woodpeckersnest.space / forums-debian-net:0 • 6 April

    I know the standard Debian installer uses lvm if you choose encryption and the process of setting up partitions is not easy to understand. I avoid the whole process and I avoid the standard installer. LVM is just another level of complexity, if you don't need it for other reasons, why use it?

    I set up Debian desktop installations using a Debian live system with Calamares and it's super easy to enable encryption. No LVM. Just set up and mount the partitions you want, use gparted if necessary. If you want LVM you maybe should not use Calamares.

    Entering the passoword only once is done automatically as long as you use the same password for both. No need for LVM. It's AFAIK neither using the decrypt_keyctl nor the decrypt_derived method on my system but it works anyway. Changing the second password to the root one was enough. But you have to keep /boot on an unencrypted partition in order to not rely on grub for decryption (grub decryption is tedious and needs unsave LUKS1 defaults).

    Statistics: Posted by ilu — 2025-04-06 17:01


    • Fo chevron_right

      General Questions • Re: [Solved] How to fix/remove permanently the &quot;No LSB modules are available.&quot; message?

      news.woodpeckersnest.space / forums-debian-net:0 • 6 April

    Thanks for the extra feedback, so far since the OS installation itself the .profile files for root and the unique user were not edited, thus there is no a custom "PATH" declared yet.
    I will take that point in consideration

    Until now the command works fine for both users

    Again Huge thanks!

    Statistics: Posted by manueljordan — 2025-04-06 17:00


    • Fo chevron_right

      Forum information, requests, and feedback. • Re: [Feedback] Das Prune: Should we purge threads and users in those threads from 2004 - 2010?

      news.woodpeckersnest.space / forums-debian-net:0 • 6 April

    Hi

    I think that the option, in Quick Links, to find / list unanswered topics could potentially clear a little space, simplify the search and just be tidy.

    But it is obviously just a choice I don't have to make, but I can pontificate.
    i know it's not related to this topic, but whatever happened to unanswered topics is a mess

    Statistics: Posted by milomak — 2025-04-06 16:49